Clint Eastwood Sues To Make Fake CDB Endorsements Go Up In Smoke; Not Leaving Filmmaking, Despite What Phony Article Says
UPDATED, 6: 11 PM: To paraphrase 1971’s Dirty Harry, Clint Eastwood wasn’t so lucky today.
In the first round of the Oscar winner’s multi-pronged defamation lawsuit against a fistful of companies for use of his name and image to promote CBD products, Eastwood and his trademark-holding Garrapata LLC lost an attempt to have a temporary restraining order granted that would “enjoin Defendants from using Mr. Eastwood’s name or likeness.”
Coming just two days after lawyers for the Million Dollar Baby director filed two jury-seeking lawsuits in federal court, Judge Cormac Carney shot down the fast peddled TRO request, at least for now.
“Plaintiff’s application is therefore DENIED to the extent it seeks relief before Defendants are given an opportunity to be heard,” the District Court judge wrote in a short-ish order (read it here). “Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ordered to meet and confer with Defendants and propose a briefing schedule concerning Defendants’ opposition to the TRO and Plaintiff’s reply. After the briefing has been completed, the Court will schedule a hearing if necessary.”
Sean Hannity Takes Issue With Fox News Colleague Tucker Carlson’s Jeff Bezos Story On-Air, Then Apologizes On Twitter
Having stumbled against the ropes, Eastwood’s lawyers tried to put a positive spin on things later Friday.
“We welcome the opportunity for the defendants to have the opportunity to be heard,” Jordan Susman told Deadline on Friday. “In fact, we sent the defendants advance copies of our application before filing and have already heard back from several of them who support our request to enjoin the misuse of Mr. Eastwood’s name.”
So, wait for Round 2.
PREVIOUSLY, July 22: The man who played Dirty Harry back in the day wants a group of online CBD retailers to make his day in court to the tune of much more than a fistful of dollars.
Seeking “an award of actual and compensatory damages in the millions of dollars” and more in profits, Clint Eastwood on Wednesday fired off a federal lawsuit (read it here) against a series of companies and their executives for placing metatags with his name in them to juice online searches. Filed at the same time, a second jury trial suit (read it here) from the Oscar-winning Million Dollar Baby director goes after Sera Labs Inc., Greendios and For Our Vets LLC for “an online scam that uses a false, defamatory, and wholly fabricated ‘news article’ about Mr. Eastwood to promote and sell cannabidiol (“CBD”) products.”
“The fraudulent ‘article’ contains links to purchase what it claims are Mr. Eastwood’s line of CBD products, thereby allowing the defendants to illegally profit from their misuse of Mr. Eastwood’s name, likeness, and false association with their products,” the suit filed by Eastwood attorneys Jordan Susman and Margo Arnold of Encino’s Nolan Heimann LLP bluntly states.
“In truth, Mr. Eastwood has no connection of any kind whatsoever to any CBD products and never gave such an interview,” adds the defamation, trademark infringement and false endorsement complaint. It also says that that claims in the fake piece that Eastwood “‘would be stepping away from the spotlight to put more time into his wellness business” and “relations with some studios grew so tense that they ended up giving him an ultimatum – acting or his wellness line” are “demonstrably untrue.”
BTW, in case you are wondering, according to his PR firm on the suits, the former Mayor of Carmel-by-the-Sea, CA actually has never expressed a “point of view about CBD products or the legitimate CBD industry.”
Certainly Wednesday’s duel legal actions had something to say.
“For more than 60 years, Clint Eastwood has been one of the most famous actors, producers, and directors in the world,” both complaints assert. “Mr. Eastwood is fiercely protective of his name and image, and has rarely licensed either for the promotion of products outside of the movies he acted in or directed,” they go on to pronounce.
“Like many of his most famous characters, Mr. Eastwood is not afraid to confront wrongdoing and hold accountable those that try to illegally profit off his name,” the filings add with no small sense of humor from the now 90-year-old cinema icon who played “the man with no name” in those classic spaghetti Westerns from Sergio Leone.
“Indeed, Mr. Eastwood previously litigated and won a jury trial against the National Enquirer, which was affirmed on appeal, after the tabloid falsely claimed to have exclusively interviewed Mr. Eastwood and misappropriated his name, likeness, and personality to promote and sell its product.”
Outside of the filing, Eastwood’s lawyer wasn’t reticent either.
“My client is not one to sit idly by as the defendants use his good name to dupe customers into purchasing products with which he has no affiliation,” Nolan Heimann LLP’s Susman told Deadline.
“While the purpose of these lawsuits is to halt and remedy ongoing defamation and misappropriation violations, they should also serve as a reminder to customers to be cautious when they see a too-good-to-be-true celebrity endorsement,” the attorney adds of an online environment where celebs like George Clooney, Oprah, Tom Hanks and even a former POTUS or two often find themselves fighting phony endorsement or product-placement advertising using their image or name. “I expect these lawsuits will send a message to others about what will happen if they spread false and defamatory statements about Mr. Eastwood or use his name and likeness without permission.”
One of a number of defendants in the complaint about the “wholly fabricated ‘news article,’ Sera Labs said in a statement Wednesday: “Sera Labs worked for a limited time with a publisher and gave them specific advertisements they could use which follow our very strict guidelines. The company shut down the ads immediately after learning that they used Eastwood’s name and likeness. Sera’s internal guidelines vividly prohibits using celebrities or false claims in its ads, and it used completely different ads that had been switched out for the Eastwood ad without any knowledge.The Company immediately severed any and all relationships with the advertiser and continue to be vigilant with monitoring any and all of our external advertising partners. We strongly encourage the rest of our industry to take these same steps to completely and immediately ensure transparency for all of our customers.”
Still, unless this is settled soon, none of that takes away from the ethos this has of “Go ahead, make my day,” as Harry Callahan said in Eastwood’s Sudden Impact from 1983.